If I were appointed to the New Online Programs Committee in a newly created private university, I would recommend a mixture of centralized and decentralized management of educational technologies. The goal would be to “develop a system that encourages teaching units to be innovative and able to respond quickly to changes in subject matter, student needs, and technology” (Bates, 2000). A mixed model would allow for the best of both worlds and fewer disadvantages. In a mixed model there would be a central unit, but also have area specialists. In having a mixture there would not be chaos or overlaps of services. A decentralized model alone can have overlap of services, no regular funding, and lack in standards. “A central unit can ensure that quality standards are followed in the development of technology based teaching and learning” (Bates, 2000). A mixed model would have a director to coordinate collaboration in teams, services, focus areas, and meeting standards.
My recommendation would go on further to say management of technology of online programs is very important and “information technology now is a core, mission-critical area for all universities and colleges, and it includes academic as well as administrative needs. Consequently, the use of information technologies needs to be coordinated, and policy, and investment needs to be planned at the most senior institutional management level” (Bates, 2000).
Which funding strategy would I recommend for my organization?
I would recommend a reallocation of internal funds for an online initiative. Currently, my organization is implementing a learning management system (LMS) in the next couple months. This is a major expensive for the organization, but very beneficial for trainings, saving administration time, and better record keeping. Developing online unsynchronized and synchronized courses within the LMS, would allow for a cut back on face-to-face teaching. “To change the way we teach by replacing some face-to-face activities with technology based learning and by making more effective use of faculty with the help of technology” (Bates, 2000). The reallocation of funds to online classes/ trainings could potentially save the company a lot of money. Funding for class trainings currently involves a lot of travel and time spent. Many of the classes that are mandatory for new hires could easily be made into unsynchronized courses on the LMS. New hires are frequent and trainings are often required before working on the job, this often causes many face-to-face trainings to be very small, I would suggest the time and money of content experts be relocated for developing online courses in the LMS. “By using Web-based materials, on-line group discussions, and email, classroom teaching activities maybe reduces by up to half, freeing the instructors for work on technology-based learning” (Bates, 2000).
Khan breaks down the organization by people, process, and project management. There are roles and responsibilities to individuals involved in eLearning projects in both Khan and Bates. However Khan is very detailed in roles and seems more fitting in my opinion for larger projects. Although I enjoyed reading about the process and design stage in Khan, I identified with the Bates lone ranger model in my own work. Bates, in my opinion is more realistic, because he talks about how projects do not always finish because of money, interest, and bad technology. One advantage to lone ranger projects according to Bates is it gives the opportunity to try new technologies and freedom. In my own work, I am apart of a lone ranger project. I am trying out new LMS for my organization. I am able to weed out the “winners” to share with a small group of stakeholders. Lone ranger projects can lose momentum as a project drags on and this can be a huge disadvantage. Being a “lone ranger” in a project takes a lot of time and that can be a big disadvantage. In my own project, demos of LMS “winners” seems to keep the small group involved in the project momentum.
Technology has brought about a change that is forcing organizations and institutions to rethink their visions and planning of education. Dr. Scott Johnson the Chief Information Officer and Associated Dean for the College of Education at the University of Illinois spoke in an interview about challenges, goals, and the development of online programs. I identified and agree with Dr. Johnson’s comment on “it is clear that a lot of the policies and procedures that we have in place for the traditional programs are not going to work for these more innovative types of programs, so we need to rethink what is involved in online delivery.” Online classes are different from traditional classrooms and they need their own set of guidelines. The learning process, making classes interactive, and being innovative are important to consider for quality in online education. Many organizations and institutions need to consider developing eLearning curriculum and programs in a different aspect. The change is institutions to provide quality online education needs to start with a vision and a plan. Dr. Johnson gave advice about online development, saying it needs to be run like a business. I think that is good advice that could be used in many institutions. As online education becomes more popular there will be more competition. The University of Illinois has strong leadership like Dr. Johnson to develop visions and plans. In Managing Technological Change, Tony Bates (2000) talks about vision in organization and institution. Bates believes vision is more important than planning. I believe vision is part of the planning process and is an important factor in reaching goals. I would not say vision is more important, because planning is needed to reach goals. ~CM~
What is eLearning management?
To manage eLearning it means identifying, maximizing options, evaluating, budgeting, training, and supporting learning through technology. The management of eLearning could include online classes synchronized or unsynchronized, online educational games, and/or applications with mobile devices.
eLearning management relates to my definition of eLearning, because in order for eLearning to be successful it needs management. Management should set goals and manage plans to get there. e-Learning Management should be aware of all new technology and what the technology could offer. To manage something as large as eLearning it is important to ensure trainings maximizes knowledge for instructional designers.
elearning is a new idea for many people and businesses. It is bringing change for everyone in schools, colleges, homes, and businesses around the world. eLearning is a new way to learn. Previously learning could only take place with didactic teaching, which is a book, a teacher, and a classroom. eLearning has given freedom to learning. eLearning is learning through technology. The technology for learning can be with a smart phone, iPad, iPod, Kindle, computer, CD, DVD, or any handheld learning devise. eLearning is not just limited to on-line classes. It is much bigger than that. When my son plays “Music Notes” a fun music game on my phone, that is eLearning. eLearning can take place along with traditional learning in the classroom or it can be untraditional through a video game. ~CM~